380 vs 38 ballistic gel

You can find those results in this post. After some velocity pre-testing, we decided to use these guns anyway because we were seeing a velocity increase of at least 100 fps with the Cheetah (with our gel test loads, the average increase ended up being 129 fps). Our test guns were a 1.9-inch Ruger LCR and a 4.2-inch Ruger SP101 (rounded to 2″ and 4″ on the charts below). The Speer and Hornady ammo are specifically designed for self-defense use with short barrels. Will mother bring you more cheetos, you poser! Based on ballistic gel data that I gathered from multiple sources, the .380 ACP bullets averaged somewhere between 9 and 18 inches of penetration in ballistic gel at defensive distances under 30 feet (with 12 inches of penetration with proper bullet expansion being considered effective for personal defense). This next illustration below shows a comparison between the .32 ACP and the .380 ACP gel test. ... 380 ACP 9mm Luger 357 Magnum 357 SIG 38 Special 38 Super 40 S&W 10mm Auto: 41 Magnum 44 Magnum 44 Special 45 ACP 45 GAP 45 Colt 454 Casull 460 Magnum 480 Ruger Lets apply some common sense to simple physics and see what the ballistic charts look like. Please note, the following information reflects the estimated average ballistics for each caliber and does not pertain to a … So, what it comes down to is real-life performance. Update 8/16/2018: Test results for nine .357 Sig loads are now live. Good write up .. And I have done a lot of ballistic testing. Mike Searson’s career as a shooter began as a Marine Rifleman at age 17. Not a bad translation. This performance is on par with any service caliber load we’ve tested including .357 Magnum. Of course they dropped that model altogether in favor of the P238 which is superficially a single-action clone of the Colt Mustang. Twenty years ago it was definitely the case, but let’s take a look at how the round and the firearms for which it is chambered have changed over the past 100 or so years since its introduction. 380 ACP brief over view and history. CCW for me is a 32NAA. If you’re looking for more .380 ACP goodness, you might want to check out this article that discusses the history of the caliber and its merits as a self-defense cartridge. There is a fourth cartridge in this family: the .32 Short, but it was essentially made obsolete when .32 S&W Long was introduced over 100 years ago. Buffalo Bore makes standard load 380 at 300ft #energy. What I don’t like is jerk-offs trying to disrupt an otherwise worthwhile conversation and comparison. Eight inches into the gel. How did this conversation go from a discussion on whether or not we agree that the .380 is replacing the .38 Special into a whining attack on a person’s character and if he knows how to insert earplugs. My Ruger LCR in 22 Magnum is light-weight revolver that definitely promises a no-recoil solution to a defensive handgun. ... About 16" of penetration in gel is a sure thing, hollow point performance is questionable for these cartridges. But you’re right about practicing. In case you missed it in the introduction, we didn’t include .38 Special and .357 Magnum in this batch of testing because we tested both of those calibers previously. And it the time I didnt feel it due to adrenaline *was getting robbed* and didnt know I was hit until I felt “wet” between… Read more ». Never shot (or handled) a 380. Obviously YOU don’t know how to properly insert a foam ear plug. I typically do not offer concrete recommendations in these tests, but I would be very reluctant to rely on .25 ACP unless I had no other option. If you dont know what that is, it is a .38 brass necked down to a .32 slug. Bullet expansion is unlikely and if it does occur, penetration will almost certainly suffer. I know it may have a few shortcomings but eight inches in the right spot is gonna stop any bad guy. WRONG! I grow weary of play ground insults. I own a Browning M1910 in .380. More modern shooters are starting out on semiauto pistols than on revolvers and will naturally go to a familiar, but smaller design instead of opting for a revolver. Not a rookie at age 77. Don’t look at me….I tend to carry 9×18 mm guns(Makarov or P64, suitably resprung). From the little boy who thinks he’s Superman…what a goober! He probably chose to keep the plugs in his ear because he was not finished shooting the day that the picture was taken and would potentially adjust the plugs properly before continuing to fire guns. You know, just to demonstrate. What a moron you are ! We'd like to personally and specifically thank Pat Childs at Fin & Feather in Iowa City, as he not only helped get most of our ammunition and other supplies, he was the brilliant gunsmith who worked with us to make this insane project much more practical.Without his help all of this would have been much more difficult and perhaps impossible. So, Clark, find a safe space please, and stay… Read more ». The 380 ACP cartridge was designed by John Moses Browning in 1908 as a compromise between 2 of his earlier designs: 25 ACP and 45 ACP. I also have a Glock 43 that I carry in a front pocket holster and it works great in most of my pants, but the KelTec goes everywhere I go, even to church. The series proved to be quite popular on the blog and also on YouTube. That’s coming close to standard 9mm. In fact, it is just the opposite. The Hydra-Shok was not bad (especially considering that bullet design tends to under-perform in other calibers). We were on the fence about including this load in our testing. I have seen a .380 that failed to penetrate a skull at close range, just going under the skin from the forehead to the back of the head, did not even knock the victim out. I have a question, are you on a Ruby Red Mountain Dew binge? What else did you need? With the 4.3-inch barrel of the KelTec PMR30, the .22 Magnum loads gained an additional 135 fps on average. However, if you’re going to put up with the excessive recoil and deafening report of this caliber in a snub nose revolver, I don’t think you should settle for “not bad” performance. After each test, we measured the penetration depth of every bullet, then extracted the bullets from the gel to measure their weight and expanded width. However, the .380 vs 9mm, with its matching bullet diameter of .355 inch, the issue becomes more complex. Not true. Take a look at it, small, reliable, but expensive. This allows the pistol to be made cheaper and for decades many 380 pistols suffered a reputation for being “cheaply made”. There is not a P238 that can hold a candle to the P230/P232 series of guns. Both having similar velocities makes the 38 special a much better penetrator and a much better self defense round as a whole. HEADS UP TO EVERYONE ABOUT THE PISSANT CLARK KENT ! Unless you have the ability to administer these techniques, no caliber will be better than the other. 380 vs. 9mm Hornady Critical Defense Denim, "Bone", and Gel Test Back in Spring 2012 I did a series to terminal tests comparing 380 and 9mm terminal performance. This increased velocity translated into better performance in gelatin as well. Ballistic Gel Comparison 380 v 9MM Results Surprised Me. By Mike Searson Clicking on the thumbnails of the expanded bullets will give you a magnified view. Yes, you can buy a very tiny 380 but they are… Read more ». And i’m fully aware of the sights and sounds that may deceive. The 85 gr American Eagle soft point and the Hydra Shok are somewhat lower recoil loads for this caliber that might be tempting options for anyone looking to make their snub nose slightly easier to handle. The differences in energy between most cartridges for carry guns are hardly worth arguing about. Velocity unfortunately is only part of the equation. Sometimes people just need a cover photo for whatever reason. The dimensions of the cartridge lie approximately midway between the aforementioned rounds. Tried a lot of em over the years. Protocols are based on the FBI’s ammunition tests the agency undertook three decades ago following the Pyrrhic victory of the 1986 FBI Miami Shootout (two agents were killed and five were wounded in a firefight against a pair of serial bank robbers. Shot well, gave me some measure of reassurance in the event my duty weapon (P220) was lost in a scuffle or major malfunction. First you try to knock Searson, now you’re going after, Lou. Left to right: Barnes TAC-XPD .380 ACP, 9mm, and .45 ACP. Legal Disclaimer, Tip:click on product names above to see full test results, this installment of the Pocket Pistol Series, Our test of the .380 ACP Hornady Critical Defense, review of the Smith & Wesson Shield 380 EZ. The 380 fits in an Uncle Mikes pocket holster in all of my pants and shorts. All Rights Reserved. No sane person would volunteeer to get shot by that round. My personal opinion, it is the perfect self defense caliber. If you’re looking for a JHP 9×18 Mak load that actually has any serious chance of expanding and penetrating, the only real contender on the market right now is Hornady Critical Defense. I have to admit ATM Im drawn to go out and… Read more ». And hollow points just under that n The .380 is lightweight and compact, but has a lower stopping power and shorter range compared to other modern handgun cartridges. P.S. Never a burp. I thought that Sig “discontinued” the P232 due to stupid import laws. We only used one test gun for this caliber because .25 ACP pistols with longer barrels are extremely uncommon, especially today. I have SD carried for 40 years and I’m a BIG 38pl fan.once upon a time the only pocket SD firearm I would have considered was a small frame 38spl 5 shooter ! Again, we could have included other calibers like .38 Special and .357 Magnum, but we’ve tested those previously.

Funny Spanish Team Names, Nms Graphics Glitch Xbox One, Amor Tumbado Genius, Wc Fields Son, Le Creuset Kone Kettle Almond, Chocolate Chip Cookie Calories Subway, General Purpose Dark Purple Dye Ffxiv, What Happened To Chris O'donnell, Chainsaw Man Ending Explained Reddit,